STUDI KOMPARASI PEMIKIRAN IMAM MALIK DAN IMAM SYAFI’I TENTANG HIBAH UMRĀ

Saifudin

  • Saifudin STAI An-Nawawi Purworejo

Abstract

Imam Malik permitted the practice of the umrā grant, while Imam Syafi’i did not allow it. In this thesis, the problem formulation is how istinbāṭ’s method of law from Imam Malik and Imam Syafi’i about umrāgrants? The research method that I use is library research with uṣūl approach. The conclusion of this research is that Imam Malik permits the practice of grants of umrā based on the fact that the grant property is the property of the grantor and the beneficiary can only benefit. Imam Malik based his opinion on the hadith narrated by Abu Dawud, An-Nasa'i and Ibn Majah, then he used qiyās simultaneously, he preached the practice of umrā grants with āriyah, so that grants could be requested again after the grant beneficiaries had used the property. Whereas Imam Syafi’i does not allow the umrā grant to be based on the hadith of Imam Malik's history and more use the meaning of zahirpronunciation or dalālahmantūq. If we compare the opinion of Imam Malik and Imam Syafi’i then it is the opinion of Imam Syafi’i who is superior and more relevant for the present.

Published
2021-07-09
How to Cite
Saifudin. (2021). STUDI KOMPARASI PEMIKIRAN IMAM MALIK DAN IMAM SYAFI’I TENTANG HIBAH UMRĀ: Saifudin . MUSTANIR: Jurnal Ekonomi Syari’ah Dan Hukum Islam, 2(01), 38-54. Retrieved from http://jurnal-mustanir.isif.ac.id/index.php/Mustanir/article/view/15